Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily West results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 1,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,529 authors). This Emily West is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emily West
Author details
Total words: 1,227
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst