Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Impact On Society results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 888 hits . Analysis detected 8,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,498 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Impact On Society is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Technology Impact On Society
Topic details
Total words: 2,838
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.0% percentile 9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 30.2% 30.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 22.2% 22.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 31.3% 31.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 31.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.9% Horn Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst