Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noor Noman results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 2,421 hits . Analysis detected 21,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,362 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,490 of 6,628 authors). This Noor Noman is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Noor Noman
Author details
Total words: 10,362
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.5% percentile 4.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.4% 23.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.1% 15.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.3% 12.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.1% 23.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst