Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Impact results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 2,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,412 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Impact is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Technology Impact
Topic details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos