Topic summary
87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Ethics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 736 hits. Analysis detected 5,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,434 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (7,703 of 15,447 topics). This Technology Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Technology Ethics
Topic details
Total words: 5,434
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos