Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Companies results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 4,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,356 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Companies is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Technology Companies
Topic details
Total words: 6,040
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos