Topic summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video3,249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Analysis results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,339 hits. Analysis detected 8,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,747 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,940 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Technology Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 9,747
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos