Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technological Risk results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Pessimism Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,247 hits. Analysis detected 10,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,094 of 16,562 topics). This Technological Risk is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Technological Risk
Topic details
Total words: 7,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos