Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bhaskar Chakravorti results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Pessimism Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,247 hits . Analysis detected 10,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,877 of 6,597 authors). This Bhaskar Chakravorti is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Bhaskar Chakravorti
Author details
Total words: 7,788
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.2% 15.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.2%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst