Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Industry Influence results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,034 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,919 of 16,562 topics). This Tech Industry Influence is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Tech Industry Influence
Topic details
Total words: 2,034
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.4%8.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos