Topic summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos315 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teacher Misconduct results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 2,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,090 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,256 of 16,559 topics). This Teacher Misconduct is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Teacher Misconduct
Topic details
Total words: 3,090
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos