Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Sheridan results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 2,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,239 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,271 of 15,388 topics). This Taylor Sheridan is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Taylor Sheridan
Topic details
Total words: 1,239
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 31.3%31.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 28.9%28.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 31.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos