Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Lien results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 480 hits. Analysis detected 2,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (9,378 of 21,548 topics). This Tax Lien is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Tax Lien
Topic details
Total words: 3,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos