Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Increases results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 62.9% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,646 of 16,562 topics). This Tax Increases is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Tax Increases
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 828
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles828 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 62.9%62.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 47.5%47.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 28.4%28.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.9%33.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.4%18.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.6%7.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 62.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 47.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos