Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Abatement results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 907 hits. Analysis detected 4,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,156 of 16,562 topics). This Tax Abatement is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Tax Abatement
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,127
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
10.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 39.4%39.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.6%42.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 17.1%17.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.3%21.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 42.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 39.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos