Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanzania results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,887 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ā 55% (7,450 of 16,558 topics). This Tanzania is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Tanzania
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 55%Tanzania (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,887
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos