Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tampa Bay Rays Stadium Deal results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,865 of 16,562 topics). This Tampa Bay Rays Stadium Deal is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Tampa Bay Rays Stadium Deal
Topic details
Total words: 1,167
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.5%18.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos