Author summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Moske results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 3,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,175 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,663 of 6,628 authors). This Nina Moske is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Nina Moske
Author details
Total words: 4,175
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst