Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tamales results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 724 hits. Analysis detected 8,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,082 of 16,636 topics). This Tamales is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Tamales
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠82%Tamales (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,119
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.7%12.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos