Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Taco Review results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 4,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,921 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,689 topics). This Taco Review is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Taco Review
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,921
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos