Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Synthetic Biology results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 482 hits . Analysis detected 2,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,771 of 16,558 topics). This Synthetic Biology is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Synthetic Biology
Topic details
Total words: 4,372
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst