Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Farming results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 2,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,927 of 16,562 topics). This Sustainable Farming is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Sustainable Farming
Topic details
Total words: 3,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos