Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esther Ndumi Ngumbi results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 2,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,185 of 6,628 authors). This Esther Ndumi Ngumbi is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Esther Ndumi Ngumbi
Author details
Total words: 3,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst