Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Energy results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,417 of 15,832 topics). This Sustainable Energy is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Sustainable Energy
Topic details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos