Topic summary
⁠10%2 analyzed articles/videos160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Cities results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 370 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (20,809 of 22,909 topics). This Sustainable Cities is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Sustainable Cities
Topic details
Total words: 1,892
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos