Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Survivorship results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,384 hits. Analysis detected 9,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,983 of 16,562 topics). This Survivorship is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Survivorship
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos