Author summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Myriam Gurba results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 2,269 hits . Analysis detected 15,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,334 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,103 of 6,316 authors). This Myriam Gurba is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Myriam Gurba
Author details
Total words: 12,334
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.8% 12.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.1% 16.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.4% 18.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst