Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Expansion results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 897 hits. Analysis detected 7,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,882 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,803 of 16,562 topics). This Supreme Court Expansion is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Expansion
Topic details
Total words: 7,882
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos