Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Ethics results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 808 hits. Analysis detected 4,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,718 of 16,562 topics). This Supreme Court Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Ethics
Topic details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.6%30.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos