Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Decision results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 2,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,799 of 16,562 topics). This Supreme Court Decision is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Decision
Topic details
Total words: 1,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.6%36.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.7%26.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 5.3%5.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 36.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos