Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supply And Demand results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 965 hits. Analysis detected 5,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,047 of 16,562 topics). This Supply And Demand is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Supply And Demand
Topic details
Total words: 3,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 24.6%24.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.8%22.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos