Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Forbes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Ad Hominem , and Straw Man , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 965 hits . Analysis detected 5,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,518 of 6,628 authors). This Steve Forbes is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Steve Forbes
Author details
Total words: 3,928
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 24.6% 24.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.8% 22.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 24.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst