Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Supervisors results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Supervisors is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Supervisors
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Supervisors (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos