Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supernatural Activity results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 1,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,016 of 16,562 topics). This Supernatural Activity is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Supernatural Activity
Topic details
Total words: 1,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510087.8% percentile
7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.5%20.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos