Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melissa James results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 269 hits . Analysis detected 1,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (553 of 6,628 authors). This Melissa James is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Melissa James
Author details
Total words: 1,312
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.7% percentile 7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 20.5% 20.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 20.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 14.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst