Topic summary
⁠87%3 analyzed articles/videos1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superhero Movies results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 754 hits. Analysis detected 5,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,290 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,956 of 15,755 topics). This Superhero Movies is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Superhero Movies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,290
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.0%12.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos