Inverse55%

'Avengers: Doomsday' Trailer Teases The MCU’s Most Terrifying Villain Yet 75%

By Dais Johnston61%

7/20/2026, 1:57:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 519 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.5% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,620 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the article peer group.

Marvel Studios Every Marvel fan remembers where they were when the studio announced the cast of Avengers: Doomsday in a slow, arduous video where names were shown on the backs of chairs over the course of almost six hours. 
There were cast members from Thunderbolts , The Fantastic Four , and Black Panther , but the most exciting additions were without a doubt the sheer number of X-Men actors , from the big ones like Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen all the way down to Kelsey Grammer and Alan Cumming. 
But with all of those new characters, how is Doomsday going to tell a cohesive story? 
In the latest trailer for the movie  surprise dropped before San Diego Comic-Con  we get our first sense of how. 
Check out the trailer below: 
The trailer opens with the plaque in front of Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters, now aged and seemingly abandoned. 
A voice  probably Robert Downey Jr.’s Doom, judging by the light European accent  begins with “Something’s coming. 
Something we may not be able to deter. 
Before this day is done. 
We shall be faced with an unthinkable decision.” 
Over the trailer’s 145 seconds, we see a whistle-stop tour of all the Avengers  and Avengers-adjacent super squads  joining forces. 
The Thunderbolts (or New Avengers) assemble in Avengers Tower with the Fantastic Four and what’s left of the past Avengers: Thor, Sam Wilson’s Captain America, and Ant-Man. 
James Marsden’s Cyclops unleashes his powers. 
Channing Tatum’s Gambit fights with Shang-Chi. 
Yelena Belova fights with herself, only for her opponent to reveal she’s actually Mystique. 
While this is shown, we hear Thor give what sounds like an epic pep talk as the de facto leader of this new group of Avengers. 
He mentions the heroes we’ve lost so far and how powerful they were. 
“Everything that they sacrificed will be for nothing if we do not stand together,” he says. 
“Put aside your petty squabbles and presume nothing except this. 
If you return, you will return as brothers and sisters. 
But mark my words, we’re going to need a miracle.” 
Steve Rogers will, in fact, return in Avengers: Doomsday. 
| Marvel Studios It looks like he gets that miracle when, in the final few seconds of the trailer, he feels Mjolnir get summoned by another worthy wielder: Steve Rogers, somehow brought back to fighting form in the present day. 
We knew that Steve Rogers would return thanks to that cryptic teaser trailer released last year, but that doesn’t make the reunion with Thor any less emotional. 
While most of this trailer just shows the assembling of the Avengers, we can actually glean a lot from Thor’s narration. 
As expected, there will definitely be a lot of conflict within this new super squad, but also, he references how every enemy they’ve fought before scared him a lot less than this one. 
Whatever Doom has in store, it’s going to be unlike anything we’ve seen in over a dozen MCU movies. 
Avengers: Doomsday premieres in theaters on December 18. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%Dais Johnston: 4.4%Inverse: 4.0%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.6%Inverse: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Dais Johnston: 3.6%Inverse: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.5%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.4%Inverse: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.2%Dais Johnston: 2.5%Inverse: 2.3%Hindsight Bias5.2%This article: 13.1%Dais Johnston: 3.6%Inverse: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias13.1%This article: 1.9%Dais Johnston: 5.1%Inverse: 4.7%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.6%Inverse: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.3%Inverse: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Dais Johnston: 5.9%Inverse: 3.8%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 8.7%Dais Johnston: 1.9%Inverse: 2.1%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 6.0%Dais Johnston: 6.5%Inverse: 8.7%Negativity Bias6.0%This article: 5.2%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.9%Inverse: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.8%In-Group Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.0%Dais Johnston: 6.0%Inverse: 5.4%Halo Effect20.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Dais Johnston: 2.2%Inverse: 1.9%Recency Bias10.6%This article: 16.2%Dais Johnston: 1.0%Inverse: 0.8%Primacy Effect16.2%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.6%Inverse: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%Dais Johnston: 4.6%Inverse: 2.7%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.2%Inverse: 2.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.3%Inverse: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 4.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.5%Circular Reasoning4.0%This article: 17.5%Dais Johnston: 7.8%Inverse: 8.0%Hasty Generalization17.5%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.3%Dais Johnston: 5.3%Inverse: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 5.0%Dais Johnston: 1.3%Inverse: 1.1%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.8%Inverse: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.7%Dais Johnston: 0.4%Inverse: 0.5%Burden of Proof1.7%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.2%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.6%Composition/Division5.2%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.5%Inverse: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.4%Dais Johnston: 2.0%Inverse: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.4%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 25.6%Dais Johnston: 2.0%Inverse: 1.6%Unattributed Quote25.6%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.0%Inverse: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 44.9%Dais Johnston: 20.4%Inverse: 21.3%Biased Writer Voice44.9%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.0%Inverse: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Dais Johnston: 3.3%Inverse: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

519 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers10%attributed speech467writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJames Marsden • 6 words • 0.0% coverageChanning Tatum • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMarvel Studios • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marvel Studios

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words77% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+80.1 ptsWriter: 19.9%Marvel Studios: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+58.7 ptsWriter: 41.3%Marvel Studios: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Marvel Studios: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.