Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Superfund Sites results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 477 hits . Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Superfund Sites is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Superfund Sites
Topic details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst