Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supercomputers results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 968 faulty-reasoning hits from 483 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,401 of 15,780 topics). This Supercomputers is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Supercomputers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 483
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.1% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles483 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 26.1%26.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.1%22.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.1%19.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.6%12.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.3%8.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos