Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Summer Safety results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,083 hits. Analysis detected 3,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,672 of 16,562 topics). This Summer Safety is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Summer Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,964
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos