Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Summer Learning results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (12,918 of 15,447 topics). This Summer Learning is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Summer Learning
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos