Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Summer Hygiene results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 2,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Summer Hygiene is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Summer Hygiene
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 28.3%28.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos