Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Frances Daniels results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 2,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Frances Daniels is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Frances Daniels
Author details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 28.3% 28.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 28.3%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 17.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst