Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sugars In Space results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,836 of 16,562 topics). This Sugars In Space is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Sugars In Space
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,407
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos