Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subway Series results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 1,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,621 of 16,562 topics). This Subway Series is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Subway Series
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠73%Subway Series (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.3%28.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos