Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subway results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 897 hits . Analysis detected 7,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,870 of 16,562 topics). This Subway is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Subway
Topic details
Total words: 6,008
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst