Topic summary
96%1 analyzed article/video805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Studio Collaborations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 2,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,415 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,039 of 16,562 topics). This Studio Collaborations is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Studio Collaborations
Topic details
Total words: 2,415
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate