Topic summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Performance results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 896 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,021 of 16,562 topics). This Student Performance is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Student Performance
Topic details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst