Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Loan Operations results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 2,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,023 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,290 of 16,559 topics). This Student Loan Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Student Loan Operations
Topic details
Total words: 2,023
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.2% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst