Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Q. Nelson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 757 hits . Analysis detected 7,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,483 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,886 of 6,362 authors). This Joshua Q. Nelson is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Joshua Q. Nelson
Author details
Total words: 6,483
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.4% 7.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst